A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are issue to demanding controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed according to Specialist advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea through a storm, do not change the fundamental points.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for a scenario that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances report about René Collier observed which the businessman had Beforehand been linked to community advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality of your coastline and also the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. It also underscores how quickly René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges for example environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.